🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 700+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5(700 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$70.87
$118.12
Sale
βœ“ on the house distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment
↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag

Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2405840

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Bags & Purses

Original Price:$118.12 USD

Sale Price:$70.87 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2328 reviews
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore love love!
highly respectable Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag.
8 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
The product quality of the Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag is acceptable.
37 people found this helpful
AR​
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag!
For the price, it works well enough so I’m okay with it.​
10 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
After a few days, the Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag is hassle-free to use and it works for me. Packaging was easy.
23 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase 
3 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
ideal in every way
In daily use, the Hello Kitty Vintage Beaded Bag feels solid so it’s acceptable. distribution was normal.
46 people found this helpful